If the compilation uses the interpreter directly, rather than a. bin files packed with the executable, but I assumed it was done just for the same of simplicity. I have seen that thread, but the download link seems dead, as if the release had been since deleted. Thank you for your continued effort and I wish for v2 to become mainstream soon because it's just so much better. I'm really excited about v2, but without being able to compile the scripts, it kind of sucks for me because the v1 is frankly a bit of a nightmare compared to v2, syntax-wise. I couldn't find a public contact to any of the people in change of AHK's development. Once again, I'm sorry to bother you about this and hope this is the correct place to ask a question like that. exe or when running it after being compiled using a v1 compiler and v1 bin When I click "Convert", I get a syntax error - the exact same error I get when trying to run the v2 script using a v1 AHK.Doesn't matter if I don't rename it and use (Default) or rename it and use the renamed version the result is always the same.Run Ahk2Exe and select a v2 script (which definitely works perfectly when using the Release.I even tried Compile_AHK, but that project is probably way outdated or something. ahk script with the same base path and name. It basically just generates a version of the AHK v2 interpreter, hardcoded to auto-run an. exe is not standalone, which makes it useless to me. Well, technically, the aforementioned technique sort of works, but the resulting. I tried several approaches, including using the AHK_H Ahk2Exe and the AHK v2. I know there is a guide, both in the included offline help and on the official web, but they seem rather vague and perhaps not entirely up-to-date to me, or maybe I'm just stupid, and I don't understand it. Believe me, I really did not want to bother you about this, but I just can't seem to be able to compile a v2 script.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |